Cases 21 - 30 of 36
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv44262
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04435
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv00565
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COWEN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03196
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CURTIS, II, KURT EVERETT DARBY, JACK DUNCAN and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cowen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02185
Plaintiff:
William Curtis, II, Kurt Everett Darby, Jack Duncan and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC and others
Davis v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03501
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Donald Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04659
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Donald Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glynn-Davis et al v. Navistar, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Margaret Glynn-Davis , Donald Davis , Teresa Davis and others
Defendant:
Navistar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08289
Plaintiff:
Cheri Davis and Donald Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32568
Plaintiff:
Kelli Marie Davis and Donald Davis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
