Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Carl et al v. Mazda Motor Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00640
Plaintiff:
Destiny Adams and Frankie Carl
Defendant:
Daicel Safety Systems, Inc, Ashimori Industry Co., Ltd., Daicel Safety Systems America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Snead v. Mazda Motor of America Inc et al
as 4:2018cv00805
Plaintiff:
Joshua Snead
Defendant:
Mazda Motor of America, Inc. and Mazda Motor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lott v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2018cv00330
Plaintiff:
Jessie A. Lott
Defendant:
Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Ford Motor Company, Mazda Motor Corporation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Erhardt v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01327
Defendant:
Standard Motor Products, Inc., Mazda Motor of America Inc., Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Helmut Erhardt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walters v. Holiday Motor Corporation et al
as 7:2012cv00011
Defendant:
Holiday Motor Corporation, Mazda Motor Corporation and Mazda Motor Of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shannon B. Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Henderson et al v. Auto Handling Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv01118
Plaintiff:
William Henderson and Angie Henderson
Defendant:
Auto Handling Corporation, Cottrell, Inc. , General Motors Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Ledbetter et al v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 2:2009cv00155
Plaintiff:
Donnie Ledbetter, Donnie Ledbetter, Jaya Ledbetter and others
Defendant:
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv05969
Plaintiff:
SAMIRAH DAVIS
Defendant:
MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC., MAZDA MOTOR CORP., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
