Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Anderson v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00619
Plaintiff:
Melva M. Anderson
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jean M. Anderson
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Schering Corp., Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01394
Plaintiff:
Karen M. Anderson
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00497
Plaintiff:
Karen M. Anderson
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2013cv06851
Plaintiff:
LAPORSCHE M. ANDERSON
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guinn et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv04780
In Re:
PLAVIX PRODUCT LIABILITY AND MARKETING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Dale Guinn, Needham O. Bunn, Nancy L. Bunn and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Guinn et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv01487
Plaintiff:
Dale Guinn , Needham O. Bunn , Nancy L. Bunn and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Anderson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20098
Plaintiff:
Shirley M. Anderson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21667
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Anderson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
