Truth in Lending Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Guadnola v. Experian Information Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00401
Plaintiff: John-Anthony Guadnola
Defendant: Experian Information Services, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MAJER v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE et al
as 3:2015cv08810
Plaintiff: ANTHONY MAJER
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC CORPORATION 1-10, PMAC LENDING SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Tate v. Carnarvon
as 5:2015cv14346
Plaintiff: Grilleane Tate
Defendant: Anthony Carnarvon
Whitfield v. BNC Bancorp et al
as 2:2015cv03330
Plaintiff: Anthony Whitfield
Defendant: BNC Bancorp and David Swanson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Sweet Jr. et al v. Thomas III et al
as 1:2015cv00259
Plaintiff: Kevin E. Sweet Jr. and Kevin E. Sweet Sr.
Defendant: Anthony Thomas III, Anthony Thomas Jr., T & E Investments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Gomes v. LTD, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00761
Plaintiff: Anthony Robin Gomes
Defendant: LTD, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Smelcer v. Buddle-Vlasyuk et al
as 3:2015cv05386
Plaintiff: James Smelcer
Defendant: Tamara Buddle-Vlasyuk, Alexander Vlasyuk, Anthony Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Sweet, Jr. v. Pizem, et al
as 14-2286
Plaintiff: KEVIN E. SWEET, SR.
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN E. SWEET, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: CHAIM PIZEM and T&E INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant: ANTHONY E. THOMAS, III
Sweet Jr. et al v. Thomas III et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00143
Plaintiff: Kevin E. Sweet Jr. and Kevin E. Sweet Sr.
Defendant: Anthony Thomas III , Chaim Pizem and T & E Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Isaacs v. Royal Bank of Canada et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01036
Plaintiff: Anna F Isaacs
Defendant: Royal Bank of Canada, RBC Capital Markets, Anthony J Giananni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?