Antitrust Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Pipe Trades Services MN Welfare Fund v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv03311
Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, GILEAD SCIENCES, LLC, JANSSEN R&D IRELAND and others
Plaintiff: Pipe Trades Services MN Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv03142
Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Gilead Sciences, LLC, Janssen R&D Ireland and others
Plaintiff: Teamsters Local 237 Retirees' Benefit Fund and Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Snipe et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02734
Plaintiff: Michael Snipe, Josh McDonald, Gabriel Molina and others
Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Gilead Sciences, LLC, Janssen R&D Ireland and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ligeri v. Monsanto Company et al
as 1:2015cv00177
Plaintiff: Benjamin Ligeri
Defendant: Monsanto Company, E.I. du Ponte de Nemours and Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Defendant: ALPHA THERAPEUTIC CO, BAXTER HEMOGLOBIN THERAPEUTICS, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF IOWA, COUNTY OF GREENE, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Interested Party: OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, LLC, EXCELLUS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, KLINE & SPECTER, PC and others
Defendant / Appellee: PHARMACIA CORPORATION, PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., KREMERS URBAN DEV. CO. and others
Not Classified By Court: M. JOYCE HOWE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE and others
Petitioner / Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK
Plaintiff: THERESE SHEPLEY, LARRY YOUNG and STATE OF VA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CEPHALON, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02141
Intervenor: PADDOCK LABORATORIES, INC., ASTRAZENECA PLC, URL PHARMA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC.
Respondent: MATTHEW PIKE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
RxUSA Wholesale, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2006cv03447
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc., Healthcare Distribution Management Association, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff: RxUSA Wholesale, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Andrew Brown's Drug Store, Inc. et al v. Abbott Labs et al
as 1:2004cv00157
Plaintiff: Andrew Brown's Drug Store, Inc., Mary Anne Anzalone doing business as Fino's Pharmacy, Blue Bell Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Defendant: Abbott Labs, American Cyanamid Company, American Home Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Altamont Phar Inc et al v. Abbott Labs et al
as 1:2002cv02121
Plaintiff: Roth-Matteo Drug Store, Inc., Bandy Drugs, Bowman's Pharmacy South, Inc. doing business as Bowman's Southtowne Pharmacy and others
Defendant: American Cyanamid Company, Upjohn Co., Ciba-Geigy Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?