Cases 41 - 50 of 253
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS HEADQUARTERS LLC et al v. MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES INC
as 2:2006cv05120
In Re:
INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS HEADQUARTERS LLC, NEW CINGULAR PLAINTIFFS, AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES INC and others
Defendant:
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC., ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., WURTTEMBERGISCHE VERSICHERUNG A.G. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Auto Body Shop Antitrust Litigation
as 6:2014md02557
Defendant:
First Acceptance Insurance Company, Inc., Automobile Club Inter-Insurance Exchange, Foremost County Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Auto Body L L C, Ginns Automotive Frame Shop L L C, Alexander Body Shop, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Learning Evolution, LLC v. CPG Catnet Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv02153
Defendant:
Blaine Ross, Michael McMahon, Category Management Knowledge Group and others
Plaintiff:
Learning Evolution, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc
Federal Trade Commission v. Peabody Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Arch Coal, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and OGE Energy Corp.
Intervenor:
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Southwestern Electric Power Company and others
Interested Party:
Morrison & Foerster LLP, Alliant Energy, Caterpillar Inc. and others
Petitioner:
NRG Energy, Inc., The Southern Company, DTE Energy Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Texas Municipal Power Agency and Western Coal Traffic League
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Crawford's Auto Center, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06016
Defendant:
Foremost County Mutual Insurance Company, Truck Insurance Exchange, Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Crawford's Auto Center, Inc. and K & M Collision, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Group 1 Automotive, Inc. as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. INOAC Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv11259
Plaintiff:
Bronx Ford, Inc., Van Tuyl Group, LLC as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships, City World Motors, LLC and others
Defendant:
Toyoda Gosei North America Corp., INOAC Corporation, INOAC Group North America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Harris County, Texas v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02296
Defendant:
PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC, MYLAN INSTITUTIONAL INC and others
Plaintiff:
HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLORIDA POST ACUTE CARE CLINICIANS, LLC et al v. GENTELL, INC. et al
as 0:2020cv60547
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA POST ACUTE CARE CLINICIANS, LLC, Vohra Post Acute Care Physicians of Texas, PLLC, Vohra Wound Physicians of CA, P.C. and others
Defendant:
GENTELL, INC, GENTELL, INC., NEBRAS HAYAK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Drs. Lutins & Benitez, P.A. v. Delta Dental Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv02205
Defendant:
Delta Dental of Wisconsin, Delta Dental of Rhode Island, Delta Dental Insurance Company-Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Drs. Lutins & Benitez, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2005
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, SUPERVALU, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
