Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff: United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant: Google LLC
Other: Brad Greenspan
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00828
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Defendant: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
The State Of Texas, et al v. Google, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv06841
Plaintiff: The State of Texas, State of Arkansas, State of Idaho and others
Defendant: Google LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Amicus Curiae: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at Fed. Question: Anti-trust
In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2021md03010
Plaintiff: Associated Newspapers Ltd., Mail Media, Inc., Emmerich Newspapers, Incorporated and others
Defendant: Google LLC, Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and others
Interpleader: State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Interested Party: The Nation Company, L.P., Genius Media Group, Inc., Mikula Web Solutions, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee: Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant: Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff: Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant: Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court: Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant: Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party: Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner: Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State Of Texas, et al V Google, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00957
Plaintiff: State of Arkansas, State of North Dakota, State of Missouri and others
Defendant: Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant: NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner: AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent: BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of TX v. Philip Morris
as 20-40383
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant / Appellant: ITG BRANDS LLC and R J REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee: Philip Morris, Incorporated

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?