Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
In Re: Modafinil AntiTrust, et al, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3475
Plaintiff - Appellee: J M SMITH CORP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company, MEIJER INC, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC and others
Defendant - Appellee: CEPHALON INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC and others
Defendant - Appellant: MYLAN LABORATORIES INC, RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings,, et al v. Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
as 15-1290
Plaintiff - Appellee: BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC., JUDITH CARRASQUILLO, on her behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., a/k/a SAJ Distributors and others
Defendant - Appellant: ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC.
Movant: CHRISTOPHER DONNELLY, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH, JIMMY JAMES THULE and others
Interested Party: COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Effexor XR Antitrust We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1274
Plaintiff - Appellant: PROFESSIONAL DRUG CO, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OP, STEPHEN L LAFRANCE HOLDINGS INC and others
Defendant - Appellee: WYETH INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Stephen L. LaFrance Holding Inc., et al v. National Milk Producers Federation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv04142
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDING INC. and STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant: National Milk Producers Federation , Cooperatives Working Together , Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. v King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00163
Plaintiff: Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. and Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc.
Defendant: King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv02436
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC. and STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY INC.
Defendant: PFIZER INC , PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS , WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC. et al v. KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01106
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC. and STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant: KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDING INC. et al v. NATIONAL MILK PRODUCERS FEDERATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00070
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDING INC. and STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant: NATIONAL MILK PRODUCERS FEDERATION, COOPERATIVES WORKING TOGETHER, DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07003
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC. and STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant: PFIZER INC., PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?