Cases 141 - 150 of 6,278
Brooks (Finley-Calip) v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2023cv05252
Plaintiff:
LaTonya R. Brooks (Finley-Calip)
Defendant:
County of Alameda, T. Rosalind, D. Pascoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baur et al v. Peoples Bancshares, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Sandra Baur and Baur Food Group, LLC
Defendant:
Peoples Bancshares, Inc. doing business as Peoples Bank and The Hartford Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adedeji v. Bank of America, et al
as 23-1837
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEHINDE OLATUNJI ADEDEJI
Plaintiff:
WOODRON INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, HARR TOYOTA, Car Dealer, KNIGHT-DIK INSURANCE, Insurance Agency and others
Rubenstein et al v. Midland Financial Co
as 5:2023cv00954
Plaintiff:
Chris Rubenstein
Defendant:
Midland Financial Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Linman et al v. Midland Financial Co
as 5:2023cv00955
Plaintiff:
Scott Linman
Defendant:
Midland Financial Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Strother v. MidFirst Bank
as 5:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strother
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Pablo Espin v. Citibank, N.A.
as 23-2083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PABLO ESPIN, NICHOLAS PADAO, KEITH TAYLOR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Dalrymple v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv04529
Plaintiff:
Deidra Dalrymple
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
Brooks v. Bank Of America
as 4:2023cv05042
Plaintiff:
LaTonya R. Brooks
Defendant:
Bank Of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Le v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 0:2023cv02963
Plaintiff:
Tuyet Hoa Thi Le
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
