Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Woodard v. 7-Eleven Inc et al
as 3:2016cv03122
Plaintiff:
Pineto Videlous Woodard
Defendant:
7-Eleven Inc and Jeff Storm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Akhtar et al v. Lynch et al
as 2:2016cv03991
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc., William Dempsey, Loretta E. Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Javed Akhtar and Kabir Javaid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin Rugamba v. Rockledge Bus (Tour), Inc.
as 16-1076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN RUGAMBA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROCKLEDGE BUS (TOUR), INC., ROCKLEDGE BUS (TOUR) INC. SUPERVISOR, MTA POLICE OFFICER 1 and others
Rugamba v. Rockledge Bus (Tour), Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03948
Plaintiff:
Martin Rugamba
Defendant:
Rockledge Bus (Tour), Inc., Rockledge Bus (Tour), Inc. Supervisor, MTA Police Officer 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rugamba v. Rockledge Bus Tour Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03034
Plaintiff:
Martin Rugamba
Defendant:
Rockledge Bus Tour, Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc., NYPD Police Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FOAGLA, Inc., et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 5:2014cv01432
Defendant:
7-Eleven Inc
Plaintiff:
Ray Dhaliwal, Jas Dhillon, John Does and others
Valenta v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Rhonda S. Valenta
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc. and 7-Eleven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cruse v. 7-Eleven, Inc
as 5:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Billy Cruse
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jerry Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
as 11-55619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY DORAN
Defendant - Appellee:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Mellen v. President Chain Store Corp et al
as 1:2011cv10216
Plaintiff:
Jay Patrick Mellen
Defendant:
President Chain Store Corp, 7 Eleven Inc., 7 Eleven Manager Lowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
