Cases 11 - 20 of 881
Emrit v. United States Embassy of Poland et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535; also known as (aka) Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America and (aka) Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee
Defendant:
United States Embassy of Poland, Embassy of Poland in the United States, State Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Emrit v. United States Embassy of Poland et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit Presidential Candidate Number P60005535; also known as (aka) Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America and (aka) Ronald Satish Emrit, & Presidential Committee
Defendant:
United States Embassy of Poland, Embassy of Poland in the United States, State Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EMRIT v. UNITED STATES EMBASSY OF POLAND et al
as 3:2024cv04656
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT Presidential Canidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as UNITES EMRITS OF AMERICA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES EMBASSY OF POLAND, EMBASSY OF POLAND IN THE UNITED STATES, STATE DEPARTMENT, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 et al v. United States Embassy of Poland et al
as 3:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant:
United States Embassy of Poland, Embassy of Poland, State Department and others
Parlon v. The United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv10886
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Parlon
Defendant:
The United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Shoba Sivaprassad Wadhia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
United States Department of Homeland Security v. Nematov
as 4:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Homeland Security
Defendant:
Umidjon Nematov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nelson v. Mayorkas
as 24-1117
Plaintiff:
CAMERON NELSON
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, United Department of Homeland Security
perkins et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
ronald oddelle perkins, Ronald Oddelle Perkins Estate et al., Kanika Glover Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, simon green ceo of the us dept. of ed. et al., United States Department of Education HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as SIMON GREEN, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Martin Ruiz v. DOS, et al
as 24-5053
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
United States Department of State, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Homeland Security and Counter Terrorism and others
United States Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement v. Singh
as 4:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and United States Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Defendant:
Gurjant Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
