Cases 11 - 20 of 3,302
Lewis v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
State of Texas, Williamson County, Texas, City of Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
South Elkhorn Village, LLC v. City of Georgetown, KY, et al
as 24-5401
Plaintiff:
SOUTH ELKHORN VILLAGE, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF GEORGETOWN, KY, GEORGETOWN MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM, CHASE AZEVEDO, in his official capacity as Manager of the Georgetown Municipal Water and Sewer System and in his individual capacity and others
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Bankers Warranty Group
as 8:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Niya Lewis
Defendant:
Bankers Warranty Group d/b/a Centricity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. City of Columbus, Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
Estate of Donovan L. Lewis
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Ohio and Chief Elaine Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis (PS) v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Lewis Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Brandon Vickrey, David Waller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Town of Elizabethtown
as 8:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
Town of Elizabethtown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcum v. Lewis
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Alex Marcum
Defendant:
Lincoln Steven Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jiang v. Dollar Tree Store 3445 Francis Lewis Blvd et al
as 1:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Store 3445 Francis Lewis Blvd, Dollar Tree Store 132-23 14th Avenue and Li Dongsheng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
