Cases 11 - 20 of 349,739
McWashington v. Rodgers et al
as 4:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Brandon McWashington
Defendant:
Brian G. Curtis, Noe Garza, Melissa A. Hinojosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Mills et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Daniel Mills, Judge Tracie Wright-Reneau, Prosecutor Jennifer Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. St. Louis County Sheriff's Dept.
as 0:2024cv02185
Plaintiff:
Seth A. Armstrong
Defendant:
St. Louis County Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Cavazos et al
as 5:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Adams and Stephanie Staubitz
Defendant:
Mayra Cavazos, Rachael Vasquez, Julia Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell, Angela v. Evers, Tony et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Angela Campbell
Defendant:
Governor Tony Evers, Associated Bank, N.A., Aaron J. Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chamberlain v. London
as 0:2024cv02184
Plaintiff:
Dagan Chamberlain
Defendant:
Bruce London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRAMER v. BOROUGH OF NAZARETH, PA
as 5:2024cv01479
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CRAMER
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NAZARETH and BOROUGH OF NAZARETH, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharp v. Comber et al
as 2:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Shannon Sharp
Defendant:
Joshua Ryan Comber, Earnest Robert Russo and City of Cottonwood Heights
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute
as 3:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goldman-Brown v. Consumers Energy
as 2:2024cv10902
Plaintiff:
Danielle Goldman-Brown
Defendant:
Consumers Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
