Cases 21 - 30 of 68
D.M. v. Forrest County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2020cv00048
Defendant:
Alyssa Chandlee, Asst. D.A. Becky Denham, Forrest County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salem et al v. Pompeo et al
as 1:2019cv00363
Plaintiff:
Z.A. (a minor child), Sallam Yahia Moflah Zandani, Sharaf Mohsen and others
Defendant:
Larry Edward Andre, Devin Kennington, U.S. Department of State and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Slabon v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv00008
Defendant:
K.M Oppendisano, D.M Mullany, John Doe 1-7 and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Slabon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.M. et al v. Minnesota State High School League et al
as 0:2018cv02140
Plaintiff:
Z.G. and D.M.
Defendant:
Minnesota State High School League, Erich Martens, Bob Madison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.M. et al v. Dungey et al
as 4:2018cv40009
Plaintiff:
D.M., I.M., B.M. and others
Defendant:
Cynthia Dungey , David Dombrosky , Ashley Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dana Maddox, et al v. City of Sandpoint, et al
as 17-35875
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANA MADDOX, on behalf of D.M. and D.M., minor children and heirs of Jeanetta Riley, deceased, D.M., D.M. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF SANDPOINT, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, CITY OF SANDPOINT POLICE DEPARTMENT, a department of the City of Sandpoint, SKYLAR CARL ZIEGLER, in his individual and official capacity and others
Sullivan v. Hart et al
as 1:2017cv11438
Plaintiff:
Michael Sullivan
Defendant:
D.M Hart, J Guigno, A. Mele and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy et al v. South Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2017cv00367
Plaintiff:
Garrett Murphy , Sarah Murphy and D.M.
Defendant:
South Tucson, City of , Thomas Schenek and Jeff Inorio
Counter_claimant:
Jeff Inorio , South Tucson, City of and Thomas Schenek
Counter_defendant:
D.M. , Garrett Murphy and Sarah Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Law Offices of H. Jeffrey Marcus, P.C. et al v. New York City Board of Education
as 1:2017cv05067
Plaintiff:
Law Offices of H. Jeffrey Marcus, P.C. , M.V. , D.M. and others
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Chanda Smith v. LAUSD, et al
as 17-55880
Plaintiff:
CHANDA SMITH, through her guardian ad litem Eliza Thompson, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated
Intervenor - Appellant:
APRIL MUNOZ, Guardian ad litem for D.M., JULIA FLORES, Guardian ad litem for A.F., CHERYL AYAPANA, Guardian ad Litem for J. A. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a California public entity and ROY ROMER, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the LA Unified School District
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
