Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Henderson v. Williams
as 13-3949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Henderson and Genevieve Henderson
Defendant - Appellee:
John Williams, John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe and others
Lovelace v. City of Ripley, Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv02466
Plaintiff:
Cleve Wesley Lovelace
Defendant:
City of Ripley, Tennessee, Lauderdale County, Tennessee, City of Ripley Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nachbar v. Miller et al
as 6:2012cv03458
Plaintiff:
Carol Nachbar
Defendant:
Allison Miller, City of Springfield Health Department, City of Springfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huon v. Mudge et al
as 3:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
Meanith Huon
Defendant:
William Mudge , Chris Hoell , Amy Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duenas-Diaz v. St Paul, City of et al
as 0:2011cv03361
Plaintiff:
Ashok Duenas-Diaz
Defendant:
St Paul, City of , John 1 Doe , John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Watkins et al
as 1:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Henderson
Defendant:
Officer Watkins , Officer Quarterman , John #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Henderson v. Williams et al
as 3:2010cv01621
Plaintiff:
Daniel Henderson
Defendant:
John Williams, John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fincher v. Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico et al
as 1:2010cv00859
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico , David J. Schmidly , Anne Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas W Fincher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Osborne v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2010cv12486
Plaintiff:
Martinez Osborne
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , Edward Thomas , William Tatum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mannix v. Maram et al
as 1:2010cv03849
Plaintiff:
Sheila Mannix
Defendant:
Barry S. Maram, Daniel Sheetz, John #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
