Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Moussaoui v. Scarborough
as 1:2020cv02572
Defendant:
Scarborough, Ricolcol and Sookdeo
Plaintiff:
Zacarias Moussaoui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moussaoui v. Ricolcot
as 1:2020cv02574
Defendant:
Ricolcot, Scarborough and Sookdeo
Plaintiff:
Zacarias Moussaoui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moussaoui v. Sookdeo
as 1:2020cv02575
Defendant:
Sookdeo, Scarborough and Ricolcol
Plaintiff:
Zacarias Moussaoui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smalls v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2020cv02968
Defendant:
Andrew Sullivan, SRP 2001-6, LLC and Mikell R. Scarborough
Plaintiff:
Clifford M. Smalls
MILLER v. MILLER et al
as 3:2020cv00091
Defendant:
RICHARD L. MILLER, KAREN CALDEMEYER, CLESTA SCARBOROUGH and others
Plaintiff:
LISA A. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langford v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05141
Defendant:
Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc., Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Erika Clarke Birg and others
Plaintiff:
Moses Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOYLE v. BABINE, COUNCILOR et al
as 2:2019cv00469
Defendant:
SHAWN BABINE, COUNCILOR, MARY PEARSON and MUNICIPALITY OF SCARBOROUGH MAINE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A DOYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2019cv04470
Plaintiff:
Charles H Cooper, Jr.
Defendant:
Franklin County, Richard Scarborough, Franklin County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RITTS et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv02979
Petitioner:
CHRISTIE SCARBOROUGH, RUDY TWOMOON, KRISTINA CASPARI and others
Respondent:
DOES 1-10 and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Langford v. Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04327
Defendant:
Magnolia Advanced Materials, Inc., Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Erika Clarke Birg and others
Plaintiff:
Moses Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
