Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tan v. Macy's Inc.
as 1:2021cv04919
Plaintiff:
Xiuling Tan
Defendant:
Macy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tan v. The Linq Hotel
as 1:2021cv04921
Plaintiff:
Xiuling Tan
Defendant:
The Linq Hotel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tan v. Honda Motor Co Inc.
as 1:2021cv04922
Plaintiff:
Xiuling Tan
Defendant:
Honda Motor Co Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Percy et al v. S & E Azrlliant P C et al
as 1:2021cv02313
Defendant:
S & E Azrlliant P C, Stealth Contracting Inc, Soil Mechanics Drilling Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non-profit, as Class Representatives, Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation
Respondent:
James M. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Golden Glow Tanning Salon, Inc. v. City of Columbus, Mississippi
as 1:2020cv00103
Plaintiff:
Golden Glow Tanning Salon, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Feng v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 3:2019cv06877
Defendant:
Amy Yim, Anna Patrowsky, County of Santa Clara and others
Plaintiff:
Karena A. Feng and Karena Apple Feng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguyen vs. The United States et al
as 4:2019cv02378
Plaintiff:
Tan N Nguyen
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lash v. Corbetts et al
as 1:2018cv02306
Defendant:
Tom Corbetts, Chancellor Woodson, Doctor Tan and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Lash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lash v. Corbetts et al
as 5:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Lash
Defendant:
Tom Corbetts, Doctor Tan, President - Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
