Cases 31 - 40 of 722
King Jefferson v. Bank of America NA, et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff:
KING CLIFFORD JEFFERSON
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA NA, GRACE JACKSON and JEFFREY MANNING, Judge
King Jefferson v. City of New Brunswick, et al
as 24-1061
Plaintiff:
KING CLIFFORD JEFFERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH VITAL STATISTIC REGISTRY
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Frost, Jr. v. Nessel
as 1:2023cv01226
Plaintiff:
Clifford James Frost, Jr and Clifford James Frost, Jr.
Defendant:
Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Duncan v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Duncan
Defendant:
Clifford A. Brown, Leon Grizzard and Terry Keel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lu v. Reyes et al
as 3:2023cv02721
Plaintiff:
Yan-Xu Lu
Defendant:
Sean D Reyes, Kyle J Kaiser, J Clifford Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Colgate Palmolive Co, et al
as 23-2982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO, PHD
Defendant / Appellee:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO, HILLS PET NUTRITION, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Defendant:
MS. KIM, DEBRA NICHOLS, DAVE BALOGA and others
JEFFERSON v. WENGUI et al
as 2:2023cv23363
Plaintiff:
KING CLIFFORD JEFFERSON
Defendant:
GUO WENGUI, DAMIAN WILLIAMS and MICHAEL J. DRISCOLL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
