Cases 31 - 40 of 117
Condiotti-Wade v. Commerce City, Colorado et al
as 1:2018cv01408
Plaintiff:
Joshua Condiotti-Wade
Defendant:
Commerce City, Colorado, Chris Dickey, Ryan Sedgwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sevier et al v. Mueller et al
as 1:2018cv00550
Plaintiff:
Chris Sevier, Lisa Boucher, Rich Penkoski and others
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, James Comey, Zainab Ahmad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARDIS v. BERGOSH, et al
as 3:2018cv01273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
GARY BERGOSH, PAMELA CHILDERS, LAURA DANHEISSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Boston Inspectional Services Department v. Dickey et al
as 1:2018cv10143
Plaintiff:
City of Boston Inspectional Services Department
Defendant:
James Dickey and East Fourth Street LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DICKEY et al v. ARDIS
as 3:2017cv00944
Defendant:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Plaintiff:
DARLENE DICKEY and SARAH HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dickey v. Baker (TWP2)
as 3:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Jawon Dickey
Defendant:
Travis Baker and Knoxville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUNNINGHAM v. DICKEY, ET AL
as 3:2017cv00485
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH LEAL CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, J ALAN KOHR, PARKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Sharp v. The City of Huntsville, Al., et al
as 17-13169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL K. SHARP
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, AL., R. H. DICKEY, Officer and S. RODENHAUSER, Judge
Andrew Scott Hernandez v. David Dickey et al
as 2:2017cv03447
Defendant:
Chris Bridges, City of San Buenaventura, David Dickey and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Hernandez
City of Boston et al v. Dickey et al
as 1:2017cv10791
Plaintiff:
City of Boston and Inspectional Services Department
Defendant:
James S. Dickey and East Fourth Street, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
