Cases 41 - 50 of 89
BULLOCK v. ANDREWS et al
as 1:2015cv00523
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ALVIN BULLOCK, III
Defendant:
SHARA ANDREWS, TRAVIS WALKER, HENRY GALLEWAY, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davies v. City of Minneapolis
as 0:2015cv01195
Plaintiff:
James Davies
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgil Popescu v. CDCR, et al
as 14-56648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIRGIL POPESCU
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, JAMES DAVIS, Chairman of Parole Board, BONITA STEWART and others
BULLOCK v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00531
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ALVIN BULLOCK, III
Defendant:
JAMES DAVIS and TOBIAS AMADIKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Davis Bennett v. Jaspal Dhaliwal, MD et al
as 2:2014cv04697
Plaintiff:
James Davis Bennett
Defendant:
E. Casino, Jaspal Dhaliwal, Does and others
White v. Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv04221
Plaintiff:
Anthony White
Defendant:
City of Chicago, James Davis and Gerald O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bender v. City of New York
as 13-4873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sherry Bender
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Corcoran, Lieutenant, N.Y.P.D., 009 Precinct, personally and professionally, City of New York, Svenstrip, Police Officer, Shield # 8986, personally and officially and others
Ramminger v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2013cv02608
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper , James Davis , Scott Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley W. Ramminger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Popescu v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 3:2013cv00564
Plaintiff:
Virgil Popescu
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Parole Department, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beverly Fuqua, et al v. Donnie Haralson
as 13-10991
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BEVERLY FUQUA, JOYCE SCALES, VIRGINIA STILLWELL GOODMAN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DONNIE HARALSON
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
