Cases 41 - 50 of 3,356
Howes v. Core Civic, Inc. et al.
as 4:2024cv01272
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., Ramous D. Lewis, Dr. unknown Sergent and others
Plaintiff:
George M. Howes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PLOURDE v. KINLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Defendant:
LEWIS BEAL, PENOBSCOT COUNTY MAINE, PENOBSCOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN PLOURDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burton v. Child Welfare Services, et al
as 2:2024cv02000
Defendant:
Brandon McLaughlin, Child Welfare Services and Christina Lewis
Plaintiff:
Marissa Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
Kintone Lewis
Defendant:
Hector Melchor, Matthew Summers and City of Bloomington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tennyson v. County Of Monterey et al
as 5:2024cv03191
Defendant:
Animal Friends Rescue Project, Mars, Inc., Pet Food Express and others
Plaintiff:
Trisha Tennyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruno Mpoy v. State of Maryland
as 24-1474
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, CAPTAIN ROBIN LEWIS, In her Personal and Official Capacity, LENWORTH W. BLACK, In his Personal and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff:
BRUNO K. MPOY, Individually and as a Next Friend of T.M. and C.M.
Kelly Rainey v. Jesse Lewis, et al
as 24-2068
Plaintiff:
KELLY RAINEY
Defendant:
CURT BECK, MICHAEL SPIEGEL and JESSE LEWIS
Lewis v. Williamson Cty, TX
as 24-50384
Defendant:
Williamson County, Texas
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Lewis et al v. Marks et al
as 5:2024cv00756
Petitioner:
Dudley Lewis and Kara Lewis
Respondent:
Kathy Marks and Bill Marks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Lewis v. Suit LLC
as 4:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Anquan Lewis
Defendant:
Suit LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
