Cases 41 - 50 of 880,067
Aigbedion, et al., v. Evanston Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Joseph Aigbedion and Isaac Prince
Defendant:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Evans Jr. v. Lumpkin Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Texas- Tyler.
as 6:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marin v. El Centro Del Barrio
as 5:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Veronica Marin
Defendant:
El Centro Del Barrio d/b/a CentroMed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. Tetens et al
as 6:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
LaCrisha Williams
Defendant:
Josh Tetens, Thomas West, Mark Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Von Feldt, Kevin v. Pederson, Kammi
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mark Von Feldt
Defendant:
Kammi Janae Pederson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ortiz v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Fabian Ortiz
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Reynolds v. KeyBank et al
as 5:2024cv11396
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Reynolds
Defendant:
KeyBank, KeyCorp and KeyCorp Mortgage Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
