Cases 51 - 60 of 89
Robinson v. Baylor NHS et al
as 3:2012cv01629
Plaintiff:
Alicia Sherrie Robinson
Defendant:
Baylor NHS and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLLINS v. KENNEBEC COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J COLLINS
Defendant:
KENNEBEC COUNTY JAIL , RANDALL LIBERTY , ARAMARK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VU et al v. W&D Apparel (Jordan) Corp et al
as 4:2012cv00282
Plaintiff:
THUY THI VU, Phuong-Anh Vu, BOAT PEOPLE SOS and others
Defendant:
JAMES SHEN, LUONG NHU DUONG, VU THU HA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Keeler v. Aramark
as 6:2011cv01372
Plaintiff:
Quincey Gerald Keeler
Defendant:
Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LaCour v. Tulsa City-County Jail, The et al
as 4:2011cv00696
Plaintiff:
Torance W LaCour
Defendant:
Tulsa City-County Jail, The, Tulsa County Sheriff's Department, Board of County Commissioners, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lymon v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 11-2210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVON LYMON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, JOSEPH NEUBAUER and CHARLIE CARRIZALES
Defendant:
WEXFORD CORP, JOHN SANCHEZ, ABNER HERNANDEZ and others
Alicia Robinson v. Aramark
as 11-10924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALICIA ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK
Horton v. Sheriff et al
as 1:2011cv06064
Plaintiff:
Sherman Horton
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cook County, Cook County, Illinois and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulcher v. Aramark Campus, LLC
as 3:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
Chasity Fulcher
Defendant:
Aramark Campus, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOYD v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2011cv00738
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICE, CHAPLAIN SCHAEFER, CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
SHAVON TYVELL BOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
