Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 941
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, et al v. Lawrence Tabak, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Madeline Krasno and Ryan Hartkopf
Defendant / Appellee: Lawrence A. Tabak, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Institutes of Health and Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Audrey Lessner v. US
as 23-1507
Plaintiff: CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE, OCERINE COOPER and others
Not Yet Classified: AUDREY LESSNER
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Connie Ford v. US
as 23-1508
Plaintiff / Appellant: CONNIE FORD
Plaintiff: CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Klyman v. Buncombe County Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00117
Plaintiff: Karen Klyman
Defendant: Buncombe County Department of Health and Human Services, Stoney Blevins, Kody Kinsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv11039
Plaintiff: Shayla Johnson
Defendant: Michigan, State of - Department of Health and Human Services, Michigan, State of, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Victoria Dillihunt v. Temple Mount et al
as 2:2023cv03247
Plaintiff: Victoria Dillihunt
Defendant: Temple Mount, The Dame of the Rock, Social Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Bambach, et al v. Gina Moegle, et al
as 23-1372
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARK BAMBACH, individually and on behalf of his minor children, E.B., in her own right and M.B., in her own right
Defendant / Appellant: GINA MOEGLE, individually, in her capacity as Children's Protective Services Investigator with Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and SUSAN SHAW, individually, in her capacity as Children's Protective Services Supervisor with Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant: STACY MAY and LAPEER COUNTY, MI
BYRD v. NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff: AUSTIN WAYNE BYRD
Defendant: NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Israel Alvarado v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 23-1419
Plaintiff / Appellant: ISRAEL ALVARADO, STEVEN BARFIELD, WALTER BROBST and others
Defendant / Appellee: LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense, FRANK KENDALL, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force, Department of the Air Force, CARLOS DEL TORO, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy, Department of the Navy and others
Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria et al v. California Department of Social Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01809
Plaintiff: Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe, Madison Fisher and Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria
Defendant: California Department of Social Services, Humboldt County Department of Health and Human Services, Connie Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?