Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Scott Dubose v. Amazon
as 24-11207
Plaintiff: SCOTT PAUL DUBOSE
Defendant: AMAZON and AMAZON.COM, INC.
Jose Gavina v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 5:2024cv00674
Plaintiff: Jose Gavina
Defendant: AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Heinz v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2024cv00714
Plaintiff: Brian Heinz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bolduc v. Amazon.com
as 24-40292
Plaintiff: Crystal Bolduc
Defendant: Amazon.com, Incorporated
Norman v. Amazon Payments Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01012
Defendant: Amazon Payments Inc., Amazon.com Inc, Corporation Service Company and others
Plaintiff: Evanthony R. Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickering v. Amazon.com Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff: John Pickering
Defendant: Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC, Foodservicedirect.com Headquarters and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Johnson v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv03208
Plaintiff: Lisa Johnson
Defendant: Amazon.com Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff: BRUCE THOMPSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ACCOUNTING SERVICE CENTER, AMAZON.COM INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1155
Plaintiff: SABRINA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, JUDGE THERESA A. BISENIUS, JUDGE JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK and others
Strege v. Gmail-Google, et al
as 24-2012
Plaintiff: ADAM STREGE
Defendant: GMAIL-GOOGLE, NEWFOLD DIGITAL, 80 Website Hosting Companies, SPAM TITAN, Titanhq.com and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?