Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Baskaran et al v. Coleman et al
as 1:2023cv02243
Plaintiff:
Archit Baskaran, Delaney Dittman, Bailey Pfeifer and others
Defendant:
#15359 Shane Coleman, #15 Sean Loughran, #5069 Peter Jonas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riaz v. Henry et al
as 1:2021cv00911
Defendant:
City of Visalia, County of Tulare, Edvin Canto and others
Plaintiff:
Samreen Riaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amanda Austin v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2019cv10031
Defendant:
Vicki M., County of Los Angeles Child and Family Services, DOES 1 THROUGH 50, Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Austin and Minor A.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MORGAN v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
DENZEL MORGAN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GIOVANNI NIEVES, MATTHEW CANTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Cortez et al
as 1:2010at00162
Defendant:
R Cortez, M. Do Canto, M. Castro and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2009cv00207
Plaintiff:
Keith Jones and Keith Jones
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, R.A. Murphy and O.A. Canto
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Branscomb v. Group USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01328
Plaintiff:
Margaret Branscomb
Defendant:
Group USA, Inc., Alma Cervantes, John Doe Cervantes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bassett et al v. Marin et al
as 1:2008cv02640
Plaintiff:
Bob Bassett, Bob Bassett, Bob Bassett and others
Defendant:
Officer Marin, Officer Ronan, Officer Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Faysal v. Do Canto et al
as 1:2007cv10761
Plaintiff:
Michael Faysal
Defendant:
Noel S. Do Canto, Boston, City of, Police Commissioner of the City of Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
