Cases 1 - 10 of 453
MCCANTS v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
as 2:2024cv05837
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MCCANTS
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO doing business as JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Casanova v. Willow Bend Mortgage Company et al
as 3:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Neisy Casanova
Defendant:
Willow Bend Mortgage Company, Craig Schrank, National City Mortgage Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pippin v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
James Pippin
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
DILLARD v. WELLS FARGO BANK et al
as 2:2024cv04146
Plaintiff:
DERECK DILLARD
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK and CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strege v. Charles Schwab et al
as 3:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Defendant:
Charles Schwab, Uranium One, Energy Fuels and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sciascia v. Chase Bank
as 6:2024cv06115
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sciascia
Defendant:
Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
The Law Offices of Angela Swan, APC v. JP Morgan Chase and Co. et al
as 2:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
Robert Carr, Angela Swan, Law Offices of Angela Swan and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase and Co. doing business as Chase Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Irina Collier v. Donald Trump, et al
as 24-10245
Plaintiff:
IRINA COLLIER
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
King v. Chase Banks
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Nikie M King
Defendant:
Chase Banks
Cross Defendant:
Stein Buck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaughn v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., et al
as 24-1016
Plaintiff:
JEANETTA VAUGHN
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., a corporation, DBA Chase Bank and TRINA PELECH, an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
