Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Giscombe v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System et al
as 6:2022cv01841
Plaintiff:
M. A. Giscombe
Defendant:
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Bayonne Community Bank, Addition Financial Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. VROMAN et al
as 2:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
LINDA VROMAN and COMMUNITY BANK & CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Brown et al
as 3:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Elizabeth A Brown, Community Bank System Incorporated, Ciox Health and others
King v. Veritex Community Bank
as 4:2021cv00989
Plaintiff:
Anita King
Defendant:
Veritex Community Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Myers v. Norman et al
as 1:2020cv00248
Defendant:
CFG Community Bank, Ronald B. Katz, Keith R. Truffer and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Momo Enterprises, LLC, et al v. Banco Popular North America, et al
as 17-3223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOMO ENTERPRISES, LLC, a dissolved limited liability company, ANASTACIO GONZALEZ and PLAZA LOUNGE, LLC, a dissolved limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee:
BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA, now known as POPULAR COMMUNITY BANK, PEAK PROPERTIES, DAVID AXELROD and others
John Doe v. BCB Community Bank, et al
as 16-4394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
BCB COMMUNITY BANK
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY J. MCNAMARA, Individually, CHARLES CENTINARO, Individually and OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS
Myers v. CFG Community Bank
as 1:2016cv03220
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Myers
Defendant:
CFG Community Bank
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 036
Myers v.CFG Community Bank
as 1:2016cv03098
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Myers
Defendant:
CFG Community Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CRESCI
as 2:2016cv04780
Plaintiff:
PETER J. CRESCI
Defendant:
BCB COMMUNITY BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
