Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Moore v. Irish et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00844
Plaintiff: Daren J. Moore
Defendant: Patrick Irish, Thomas Andreazzi, Robert Fenner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In Re: Brandan David Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv03799
Not Yet Classified: Brandan David Smith Moor irish beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in Propria Persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae doing business as BK EL Trust doing business as BRANDAN DAVID SMITH et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Balfour v. Jackson HMA, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff: Susie Annie Balfour and Susan Ann Balfour
Defendant: Jackson HMA, LLC doing business as Merit Health Central, VitalCore Health Strategies, LLC, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rossidoc LLC et al v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv13410
Plaintiff: ROSSIDOC LLC d/b/a The Irish Nobleman, an Illinois limited liability company; and ARMITAGE BARS, INC., d/b/a Chicago Bar Shop, Rossidoc LLC an Illinois limited liability company doing business as The Irish Nobleman and Armitage Bars, Inc. doing business as Chicago Bar Shop
Defendant: THE CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, and DANIEL LA SPATA, an individual, The City of Chicago and Daniel LaSpata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brett v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv04535
Plaintiff: Frank Brett
Defendant: Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Robert Rochinel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Irish v. Keith McNamara
as 23-3034
Plaintiff / Appellee: Daniel Irish
Defendant / Appellant: Keith McNamara, in his individual capacity as a Hennepin County Sheriff's Deputy
Estate of Matthew Reynolds v. Oregon Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2023cv00705
Plaintiff: Estate of Matthew Reynolds
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Oregon Department of Human Services and Rhonda Irish
Defendant: Angela Kneeland, Regina Rushford, Amy Youngfish and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Marlynne Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irish v. McNamara We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv00619
Plaintiff: Daniel Irish
Defendant: Keith McNamara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan Crownholm, et al v. Richard Moore, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-15138
Plaintiff / Appellant: RYAN CROWNHOLM and CROWN CAPITAL ADVENTURES, INC., a Delaware corporation, registered as a foreign corporation in California, DBA mysiteplan.com
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD B. MOORE, in his Official Capacity as Executive Officer of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, ROSSANA D'ANTONIO, in her Official Capacity as President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, MICHAEL HARTLEY, in his Official Capacity as Vice-President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists and others
Ryan Crownholm, et al v. Richard Moore, et al
as 23-15093
Plaintiff / Appellant: RYAN CROWNHOLM and CROWN CAPITAL ADVENTURES, INC., a Delaware corporation, registered as a foreign corporation in California, DBA mysiteplan.com
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD B. MOORE, in his Official Capacity as Executive Officer of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, ROSSANA D'ANTONIO, in her Official Capacity as President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists, MICHAEL HARTLEY, in his Official Capacity as Vice-President of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?