Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Patton v. Fitzhugh et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Bradley Patton
Defendant:
Mike Fitzhugh, Melissa Harrell, Judge James Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Hall et al
as 4:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Eugene James Turner
Defendant:
Amy Hall, Wendell Franklin and City of Tulsa, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Alberto et al
as 3:2020cv02980
Defendant:
Jon Persinger, Sergeant Sonsup, Jeff Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Randell Turner and Randell Lowell James Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTKOWITZ v. TURNER et al
as 3:2017cv06622
Plaintiff:
JAMMIE RUTKOWITZ
Defendant:
JAMES TURNER, KRISTINA REED TURNER, DEAN C. GRESEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv01679
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L. ROWE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANCEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAIN, et al., v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2013cv01103
Plaintiff:
TERRY THEDALE CAIN, JR. , JA KWAN BROWN , ELLIE JAMES TURNER/BROOKS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Turner v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
as 13-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
Turner v. Canadian National Police Department
as 2:2011cv13281
Plaintiff:
James Turner
Defendant:
Canadian National Police Department
Gallishaw v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 3:2010cv02582
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gallishaw
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of , Office of Attorney General , Mary Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campana, et al v. Florida Mall Assoc, et al
as 6:2000cv01263
Plaintiff:
Christy Campana and Richard Frank
Defendant:
Simon Property Group, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as Florida Mall, Florida Mall Associates and Simon Property Group, L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
N. James Turner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
