Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Syris Birkley v. Liam Nitz, et al
as 24-2176
Defendant:
MICHAEL HANNAH, LIAM NITZ and MICHAEL STEVENS
Plaintiff:
SYRIS BIRKLEY
Stevens v. Board Of Pardons And Paroles
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Michael Stevens
Defendant:
Board Of Pardons And Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Stevens v. County of Neveda et al
as 2:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
Jeramy Michael Stevens
Defendant:
County of Neveda, Kiira Jefferson, Sharry Shumaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edwards v. Stevens et al
as 4:2023cv04106
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey W. Edwards
Defendant:
Michael Stevens, Tyler Matson and Lisa May Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
CARPENTER v. GRAB et al
as 3:2022cv01722
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GRAB and NIKOLAUS & HOHENADEL, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McMurrin v. Batista et al
as 2:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline McMurrin
Defendant:
Lewis Alfonso Vega Batista, Unknown Batista, Michael Steven Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Internal Revenue Service, Fresno et al
as 1:2021cv00320
Defendant:
United States and Internal Revenue Service, Fresno
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauermeister v. Youtube, LLC
as 8:2017cv00437
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Bauermeister
Defendant:
Youtube, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Ali et al v. Mina et al
as 6:2017cv01410
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Ali and Royal Investment Group Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Mina and Michael Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knezevich v. Ptomey et al
as 4:2017cv10056
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Knezevich
Defendant:
William Reagan Ptomey , Patrick McCullah and Matthew J. Wildner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
