Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ernest Bonner, Jr. v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.
as 23-15928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST L. BONNER, Jr., M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC., erroneously sued as Rite Aid Corporation, DBA Rite Aid
Sun v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 1:2022cv03702
Plaintiff:
Jiaming Sun
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gary Easley v. Kaiser Hospital, et al
as 21-16655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY D. EASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
KAISER HOSPITAL, SANTA CLARA COUNTY VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, WALGREENS, INC. and others
Ariyan, Inc. et al v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans et al
as 2:2021cv00534
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Baloney, Beth Duessing, Mark Defelice and others
Defendant:
Ghassan Korban and Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Manuel Verdugo et al v. City of El Centro et al
as 3:2020cv02458
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation, Manuel Meza, Sgt. Damian Valdez and others
Plaintiff:
Sacramento Verdugo, Estate of Manuel Verdugo and Stacy Verdugo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Bonner v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 2:2019cv00674
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ernest L. Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Campbell v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 2:2018cv01799
Plaintiff:
Richard Campbell
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
CUPPETT v. RITE AID CORPORATION
as 3:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
CARY J. CUPPETT
Defendant:
RITE AID CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sears v. The Kroger Company et al
as 2:2017cv04394
Plaintiff:
Lonnie P. Sears
Defendant:
The Kroger Company , Rite Aid Corporation , Kroger Store #02900772 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frisbie v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 5:2014cv03836
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Frisbie, Jr.
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
