Cases 1 - 10 of 33
In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202
as 23-13085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE NEW GEORGIA PROJECT, BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, RISE, INC. and others
Intervenor:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, MATTHEW MASHBURN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR DOUGHERTY COUNTY and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, JOHNNY VARNER, JACK NOA and others
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, EQUAL GROUND EDUCATION FUND, VOTERS OF TOMORROW ACTION, INC. and others
Defendant:
CORD BYRD, ASHLEY MOODY, KIM BARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VOTE.ORG et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant:
CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McLaughlin et al v. Onslow County Board of Elections et al
as 7:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
joseph robert mclaughlin, lori ready-digiovanni and juan carlos beltran
Defendant:
onslow county board of elections, jason dedmond, michael a morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DONDIEGO et al v. LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv02111
Plaintiff:
MARCIA DAY DONDIEGO, RUTHANN BAUSCH, JUDITH REED and others
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and LEIGH M. CHAPMAN
Intervenor Plaintiff:
NICK MILLER
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and JARRETT COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dodge et al v. Lee et al
as 6:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Andrew S. Dodge and Danelle L. Dodge
Defendant:
Laurel M. Lee, Ashley Moody and Lori Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al
as 21-1442
Plaintiff:
KEVIN O'ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and others
Defendant:
MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually and others
Appellant:
GARY D. FIELDER and ERNEST J. WALKER
IN RE GEORGIA SENATE BILL 202
as 1:2021mi55555
Plaintiff:
The New Georgia Project, Black Voters Matter Fund, Rise, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan, David Worley and others
Intervenor Defendant:
National Republican Congressional Committee and Republican National Committee
Amicus Curiae:
Amicus Curiae, American Center for Law and Justice, Foundation for Government Accountability and others
Petitioner:
District of Columbia, Public Interest Legal Foundation, Senator Max Burns and others
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk of the Superio Debra DeBerry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al
as 21-1394
Plaintiff:
KEVIN O'ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and others
Defendant:
MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually and others
Appellant:
GARY D. FIELDER and ERNEST J. WALKER
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021mc81824
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant:
Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONALCOMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
3Rd Party Defendant:
The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
