Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund and others
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, William R Adair, T Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1593
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1602
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1601
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in hr official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1594
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk, MARY H. MELFI, in her capacity as Hunterdon County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Republican National Committee et al v. Aguilar et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Republican National Committee, Nevada Republican Party and Scott Johnston
Defendant:
Francisco Aguilar, Lorena Portillo, Hoen Scott William and others
Intervenor:
Rise Action Fund, Institute for a Progressive Nevada and Nevada Alliance for Retired Americans
Amicus Curiae:
ACLU of Nevada and Democratic National Committee
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 20507 Administration of Voter Registration
KIM et al v. HANLON et al
as 3:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE GIORDANO HANLON, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO and others
Intervenor:
LAURA ALI, JOSE ARANGO, New Jersey Republican Chairs Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY, Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund and others
Interested Party:
DALE CROSS, JEFF PARROTT and TAHESHA WAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hafner v. Scott et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Phillip B. Scott, Charity R. Clark and Sarah Copeland Hanzas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant et al v. Knapp et al
as 2:2023cv06838
Plaintiff:
Trudy B Grant, Sarah Krawcheck, Nashonda Hunter and others
Defendant:
Howard Knapp, John Wells, JoAnne Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raskin v. Jenkins
as 23-10960
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allyson Raskin
Appellant:
Kyle Strongin, Lindsey Gremont, Christine Koepke and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Clay Jenkins, Dallas County Judge and Michael Scarpello, Dallas County Elections Administrator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
