Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dollar Phone Access Inc v. AT&T Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00404
Plaintiff:
Dollar Phone Access Inc
Defendant:
AT&T Inc , AT&T Services Inc , Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151
United States of America v. Billion Auto, Inc et al
as 5:2014cv04118
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Billion Auto, Inc , Billion SC, Inc , Billion NSC, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
U V Logistics L L C v. D D T Inc et al
as 6:2014cv00128
Plaintiff:
U V Logistics L L C
Defendant:
D D T Inc and Landstar Ranger Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
F B T, Inc. v. Aesa Logistics Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv01734
Plaintiff:
F B T, Inc.
Defendant:
Aesa Logistics Corp. and Dawn Food Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce Act
Viasystems Technologies Corporation LLC v. Landstar Ranger Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00577
Plaintiff:
Viasystems Technologies Corporation LLC
Defendant:
Landstar Ranger Inc, JT&T Inc and ABC Global LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chander et al v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2009cv02187
Plaintiff:
Vishal Chander and The Chander Law Firm
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Wince et al v. Easterbrooke Cellular Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00135
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wince, Joshua Wince, Joshua Wince and others
Defendant:
Easterbrooke Cellular Corporation, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, AT&T Mobility II LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Knudtson v. AT&T Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00837
Plaintiff:
Corey J Knudtson
Defendant:
AT&T Inc and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Rumbough v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00657
Plaintiff:
Larry Rumbough
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., Nationwide Credit, Inc. and Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
