Cases 121 - 130 of 827,871
Pinnacle Bank v. Veterinary Management Incorporated, et al
as 3:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle Bank
Defendant:
Veterinary Management Incorporated, Main Street Veterinary Holdings, LLC, David S Hoe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Whalen, Mark et al v. MacKenzie, Dana et al
as 3:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Mark Whalen and Jake Whalen
Defendant:
Dana MacKenzie and Tyler Selk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montero, Ramon S. v. Warden Grant Heuett
as 1:2024cv21993
Plaintiff:
Ramon Sosa Montero
Defendant:
Warden Grant Heuett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. Hill et al
as 2:2024at00657
Plaintiff:
Brounche S. Green
Defendant:
R. Hill and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRUTZIUS v. LEWIS BROTHERS BAKERIES, INC.
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Joshua Grutzius
Defendant:
Lewis Brothers Bakeries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Midwest Ozone Group v. EPA, et al
as 24-1146
Petitioner:
Midwest Ozone Group
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Starbucks Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
as 24-11643
Petitioner:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Brian H. Herschfus, et al v. City of Oak Park, MI, et al
as 24-1451
Plaintiff:
BRIAN H. HERSCHFUS AND FERN SHARI HERSCHFUS JOINT REVOCABLE TRUST, u/a/d March 22, 1994 as amended and BRIAN H. HERSCHFUS, individually and as Trustee
Defendant:
CITY OF OAK PARK, MI, a municipal corporation, ERIK TUNGATE, City Manager, ROBERT BARRETT, Technical and Planning Services Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
