Cases 11 - 20 of 160
Weaver v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00454
Petitioner:
Dianne L. Weaver, Philip J. Emerson, Jr. and P J Emerson
Respondent:
Jerry Parker and Alfonso Charles
Defendant:
Kelly Cole, Holly Lake Ranch Association (HLRA), Patty Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emerson v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00453
Petitioner:
Philip James Emerson, Jr
Respondent:
Jerry Parker, Kevin White and Kelly Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James Wilson v. Donald Emerson
as 23-2751
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES G. WILSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD EMERSON, Warden
SHELL v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2023cv00887
Petitioner:
HENRY LEE SHELL, JR.
Respondent:
D. EMERSON and CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEBB v. EMERSON
as 2:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
KEIONTAE WEBB
Respondent:
D. EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2023cv00034
Petitioner:
Emerson Brooks
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norton v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Emerson v. Klyce et al
as 1:2023cv01014
Petitioner:
Jarvis Tremaine Emerson
Respondent:
Troy Klyce and Crockett County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jose Emerson Rodriguez Gonzalez v. Bryan Birkholz
as 2:2022cv09202
Petitioner:
Jose Emerson Rodriguez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WHITAKER v. EMERSON
as 1:2022cv01083
Petitioner:
MICHAEL AARON WHITAKER
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
