Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Thomas v. Smith
as 22-60205
Petitioner / Appellant:
Forrest Thomas, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Brandon M. Smith, Warden, Carroll/Montgomery Regional Correctional Facility
CULMER v. SMITH
as 3:2022cv00056
Petitioner:
DANIEL J. CULMER
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CULMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
DANIEL J. CULMER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and WARDEN CHRISTIAN M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith, Deandre v. Eplett, Cheryl
as 3:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
Deandre M. Smith
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv24584
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and TGK jail
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Streeval
as 7:2020cv00439
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Petitioner:
Brennen M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Costel v. Davis
as 4:2020cv02686
Petitioner:
Gavril Costel
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and Joe M Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TAVERAS v. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE et al
as 3:2020cv00120
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE, WARDEN OF CAMBRIA COUNTY and CHRISTAIN M. SMITH
Petitioner:
JUNIOR TAVERAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARRY v. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE et al
as 3:2020cv00051
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE and CHRISTIAN M. SMITH
Petitioner:
ABDOULAYE BARRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. WARDEN
as 1:2020cv05991
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
G. M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
