Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Hall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2012cv62505
Petitioner:
Donald R. Hall
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Hall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv01281
Petitioner:
Donald R. Hall
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALL-BEY v. KNIGHT
as 2:2012cv00089
Petitioner:
ERVIN R. HALL-BEY
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALL v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 2:2012cv00169
Petitioner:
JAMES R. HALL
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2011cv01463
Petitioner:
James R. Hall
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL v. WALSH et al
as 2:2010cv07572
Petitioner:
SHAWN R. HALL
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA/YORK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL v. USA et al
as 2:2010cv00503
Plaintiff:
KEVIN R HALL
Respondent:
USA and HALFWAY HOUSE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hall v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2010cv00501
Petitioner:
Reginald R Hall
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2010cv00475
Petitioner:
Reginald R Hall
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv04095
Petitioner:
Lemuel R. Hall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
