Cases 11 - 20 of 7,146
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
Charles David Coker
Respondent:
T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryan v. Cohen
as 5:2024cv02907
Petitioner:
T Terell Bryan
Respondent:
Warden Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO et al
as 5:2024cv01942
Petitioner:
LEWIS T. WATKINS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01224
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01225
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luedtke v. Lilliard
as 3:2024cv01197
Petitioner:
James Luedtke
Respondent:
T Lilliard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02088
Petitioner:
Marty Johnson
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Turean T. Johnson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPENCER-HILL v. KELSEY
as 1:2024cv05402
Petitioner:
JASON T. SPEUCER-HILL
Respondent:
DAVID KELSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
