Cases 11 - 20 of 904
Owens v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Devraughne Terrell Owens
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 9:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Calvin Terrell Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Perry Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrell v. Lovette
as 5:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrell Williams v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 23-13948
Petitioner / Appellant:
TERRELL WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - MEDIUM
Terrell v. Lovette
as 3:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jenkins v. Lilley
as 1:2023cv09613
Petitioner:
Terrell Jenkins
Respondent:
Superintendent Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tompkins v. Rickard
as 3:2023cv02006
Petitioner:
Terrel Tompkins
Respondent:
Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Terrell v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00235
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hargrove v. Warden Healy
as 4:2023cv01857
Petitioner:
Terrell Anthony Hargrove
Respondent:
Warden Ian Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04467
Petitioner:
Terrell Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
