Cases 21 - 30 of 406
Roderick Sims v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 22-3409
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK SIMS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Sims v. Bracy
as 1:2022cv02122
Petitioner:
Jerry Sims, Jr.
Respondent:
Charmaine Bracy and Warden Charmaine Bracy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Falkenrath
as 4:2022cv00721
Petitioner:
Zeno E. Sims
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Oliver et al
as 1:2022cv01550
Petitioner:
Roderick Sims
Respondent:
Ms. Oliver, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and J. Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Robin M. Sims
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Roderick Sims v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 22-2404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK SIMS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY UNION COUNTY
Sims v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2022cv00077
Petitioner:
David A. Sims
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Huffman
as 2:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Sims
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Butler
as 7:2022cv00637
Petitioner:
Milton Powell Sims
Respondent:
Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00162
Petitioner:
Milton Powell Sims
Respondent:
Warden Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
