General Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 47
JOHNSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv01896
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Penson v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-40141
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL PENSON
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE THREE RIVERS
Tasker v. Uttecht We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv03165
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Tasker, II
Respondent: Jeffrey A Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher McKenzie v. Warden
as 17-11223
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL MCKENZIE
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN
Penson v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00403
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Penson
Respondent: Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKenzie v. Berry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00048
Petitioner: Christopher Michael McKenzie
Respondent: Walter Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKenzie v. Berry
as 1:2016cv01265
Petitioner: Christopher Michael McKenzie
Respondent: Walter Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cobos v. Ector County
as 7:2015cv00183
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Cobos
Defendant: Ector County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schmidt v. Paramo et al
as 3:2014cv01851
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Schmidt
Respondent: Daniel Paramo and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuller v. State of Texas
as 1:2014cv00610
Petitioner: Christopher Michael Fuller
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Respondent: State of Texas
Defendant: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?