General Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 301
Walker v. Scott et al
as 1:2022cv01546
Petitioner: Frankie N. Walker
Respondent: Gregg Scott and Josh Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHELTON v. LEV
as 1:2022cv00177
Petitioner: EDDIE SHELTON
Respondent: D. LEV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
THOMAS v. SMITH
as 1:2022cv00437
Petitioner: SHELTON R THOMAS
Respondent: Warden Tamarshae Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. SMITH
as 5:2022cv00052
Petitioner: SHELTON R THOMAS
Respondent: WARDEN TAMARSHAE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Kent
as 22-30045
Petitioner / Appellant: Kenneth W. Shelton
Respondent / Appellee: Jason Kent, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Bradley Shelton v. Stephen Spaulding
as 22-1024
Petitioner / Appellant: BRADLEY S. SHELTON
Respondent / Appellee: ANDREW CIOLI, D. GONZALEZ, JR. and STEPHEN SPAULDING, Warden
SHELTON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv05433
Petitioner: SIDDIQ SHELTON
Respondent: CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHELTON v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2021cv01694
Petitioner: KAHLIL T. SHELTON
Respondent: MARK CAPOZZA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Shelton v. USDC Northern Alabama We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02113
Petitioner: Dwight Rolland Shelton and Dwight Rolland Shelton, Jr
Respondent: USDC Northern Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benoite v. Cioli et al
as 3:2021cv50436
Petitioner: Shelton John Benoite
Respondent: A. Cioli and SMU Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?