General Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 143
LoDuca v. Superintendent of SCI-Mercer et al
as 4:2021cv00627
Respondent: Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Superintendent of SCI-Mercer
Petitioner: Joseph LoDuca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STEWART v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2021cv00458
Petitioner: JOSHUA L. STEWART
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, KEVIN KAUFFMAN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rowles v. Warden of SCI-Mercer et al
as 1:2021cv00304
Respondent: Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of SCI-Mercer
Petitioner: Brandon Rowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCAMEY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv00192
Respondent: BARRY SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY
Petitioner: PATRICK SHAWN MCCAMEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MERCER v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00055
Respondent: T.J. WATSON
Petitioner: RILEY ANTONIO MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TACKETT v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv02002
Respondent: BARRY SMITH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: MICHAEL TACKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TACKETT v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00332
Respondent: BARRY SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY/MERCER COUNTY and others
Petitioner: MICHAEL TACKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Skeens v. King We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00749
Respondent: Mercer County and Timothy King
Petitioner: William Parris Skeens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MERCER v. WATSON
as 2:2020cv00485
Petitioner: RILEY A. MERCER
Respondent: T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dennis v. United States of America
as 5:2020hc02170
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Hugh Mercer Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?