Cases 31 - 40 of 7,147
(HC) Saenz v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00395
Petitioner:
Robert G. Saenz
Respondent:
T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaye v. McGunnes
as 1:2024cv02478
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Kaye
Defendant:
Thomas T. McGunnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher West v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1611
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER H. WEST
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Franklin Wright v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1614
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WRIGHT
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Blakney v. Garland et al
as 5:2024hc02067
Petitioner:
Larry Blakney
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Horne v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02065
Petitioner:
Calvin Lee Horne
Respondent:
Decretary T. Ishee and Secretary T. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernard Ellerbe v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1526
Plaintiff:
BERNARD D. ELLERBE
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Davis v. Salisbury
as 24-1218
Petitioner:
JOSHUA DAVIS
Respondent:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR. and WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., Acting Director of Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Burke v. Deml
as 2:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
James T. Burke
Respondent:
Nick Deml
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. 37th Circuit Court et al
as 1:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Kevin Theodore Wilson and Kevin T. Wilson
Respondent:
37th Circuit Court, Calhoun County Sheriff's Department and Steven Hinkley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
