Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Payne v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2011cv00246
Petitioner:
Rafael Payne
Respondent:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hodges v. Pima County Adult Detention Center et al
as 3:2011cv05555
Plaintiff:
Shawn W. Hodges
Respondent:
Pima County Adult Detention Center
Defendant:
Clarence W. Dupnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guerrero v. Ortiz et al
as 5:2011cv00684
Defendant:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center and Amadeo Ortiz
Plaintiff:
Abel A. Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Goodrich, et al
as 11-2159
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD F. ROMERO
Respondent - Appellee:
DONNA K. GOODRICH, Warden, Gallup McKinley Adult Detention Center and PUEBLO OF NAMBE
Omosule v. Greene County Adult Detention Center
as 3:2009cv00374
Petitioner:
Oluwadayisi Omosule
Defendant:
Greene County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smiley v. Lynchburg Adult Detention Center et al
as 7:2009cv00345
Petitioner:
Arelius Roboretello Smiley
Respondent:
Lynchburg Adult Detention Center and The Commonwealth Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2007cv01008
Petitioner:
Paul Douglas Mason Hale
Respondent:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fullbright v. Mundt et al
as 5:2007cv03120
Petitioner:
Chad M Fullbright
Respondent:
Lawrence Mundt and Leavenworth Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hale v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2007cv00318
Petitioner:
Paul Douglas Mason Hale
Respondent:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
