General Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 14,704
David Kitt v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11561
Petitioner: DAVID M. KITT
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Ryricka Custis v. David Anderson
as 24-6464
Petitioner: RYRICKA NIKITA CUSTIS
Respondent: DAVID ANDERSON
Collins v. Dauzat
as 24-30306
Petitioner: Richard F. Collins, Jr.
Respondent: Michele Dauzat, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Adolfson, David v. Florida Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv14154
Plaintiff: David Adolfson
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner: Charles David Coker
Respondent: T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Bradley
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff: Kareem M. Edwards
Defendant: Warden David Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spalding v. United States
as 24-6091
Petitioner: DAVID L. SPALDING
Respondent: UNITED STATES
REYES v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI FOREST et al
as 2:2024cv02036
Petitioner: DAVID REYES
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT SCI FOREST, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lucas v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Petitioner: David Lee Lucas
Respondent: Placer County Superior Court and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Strickland et al
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner: Thaddeaus Jones
Respondent: David Strickland and Baniecia Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?