Cases 41 - 50 of 596
HUNTER v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01800
Petitioner:
STEVEN MALCOLM HUNTER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Doe
as 4:2022cv00584
Plaintiff:
Brad Hunter Smith
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUNTER v. KALLIS
as 2:2022cv00232
Petitioner:
ERIC MICHELLE HUNTER
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Joseph Becker v. Hunter Anglea
as 22-15867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH P. BECKER
Respondent / Appellee:
HUNTER ANGLEA
Pauline Hunter v. Alex Villanueva
as 2:2022cv03324
Petitioner:
Pauline Clay Hunter, Pauline Clay and Pauline Hunter
Respondent:
Alex Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melnick v. Polis et al
as 1:2022cv01139
Petitioner:
Hunter Adam Melnick
Respondent:
Jared Polis, Kristen Hilkey and Dean Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Wade et al
as 1:2022cv00474
Petitioner:
Otis Lee Hunter
Respondent:
Matthew Wade and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hunter v. State of Florida, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv14128
Plaintiff:
Jason Hunter
Defendant:
State of Florida, Department of Corrections, Highlands County, Richard Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Waybourne
as 4:2022cv00266
Petitioner:
Johnny A Hunter
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Hunter v. Scott Jones
as 22-15437
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
