Cases 41 - 50 of 5,379
Ryan Widmer v. Jossette Okereke
as 24-3054
Petitioner:
RYAN K. WIDMER
Respondent:
JOSSETTE OKEREKE, Warden
Daniel Cobble v. Warden Edgefield Federal Correctional Institution
as 24-6053
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE, a/k/a Johnathan Wayne Plemons
Respondent:
WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION EDGEFIELD
LEWIS v. GILLIS
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
CHANEY K LEWIS
Respondent:
SHAWN GILLIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Gillis
as 4:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Chaney K. Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Shawn Gillis
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Eplett
as 2:2023cv01743
Petitioner:
Jeffrey K Walker
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dority v. Bennet
as 1:2023cv01461
Petitioner:
Angela Michelle Dority
Respondent:
K. Bennet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lynch v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Bryan K Lynch
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hakeem v. Ray et al
as 3:2023cv00255
Petitioner:
Okerayi K. Hakeem
Respondent:
H. Ray, Z. Moore and P. Betschart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 23-7289
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Evans v. Falkenburg Road Jail
as 8:2023cv02851
Petitioner:
Rickey Lamar Evans, Jr.
Respondent:
Falkenburg Road Jail and Marrissa K. Rozas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
